Talk:Tenant by Spousal Status (RTA): Revision history

19 March 2024

• curprev 15:4315:43, 19 March 2024‎ MKent talk contribs‎ 14,200 bytes −4‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails? Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 15:4215:42, 19 March 2024‎ MKent talk contribs‎ 14,204 bytes +4‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails? Tag: Reverted

3 May 2021

• curprev 14:2414:24, 3 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 14,200 bytes −1‎ →‎Re: If the spousal status has been removed, does the former spouse lose the protection of the RTA?
• curprev 14:0814:08, 3 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 14,201 bytes +1,396‎ →‎Re: If the spousal status has been removed, does the former spouse lose the protection of the RTA?
• curprev 13:4413:44, 3 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 12,805 bytes +222‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails?
• curprev 13:4213:42, 3 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 12,583 bytes +4‎ →‎Conflict of Laws (Re: Conclusions)
• curprev 13:3213:32, 3 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 12,579 bytes −37‎ →‎Legal Analysis (Re: Fact Situation)
• curprev 13:3213:32, 3 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 12,616 bytes −134‎ →‎Fact Situation

2 May 2021

• curprev 23:0423:04, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 12,750 bytes +357‎ →‎Conflict of Laws (Re: Conclusions)
• curprev 23:0123:01, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 12,393 bytes +155‎ →‎Conflict of Laws (Re: Conclusions)
• curprev 22:5722:57, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 12,238 bytes +39‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails?
• curprev 22:5522:55, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 12,199 bytes +23‎ →‎Conflict of Laws (Re: Conclusions)
• curprev 22:5422:54, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 12,176 bytes +43‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails?
• curprev 22:5122:51, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 12,133 bytes +224‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails?
• curprev 22:4222:42, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 11,909 bytes +295‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails?
• curprev 22:3222:32, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 11,614 bytes +474‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails?
• curprev 22:0122:01, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 11,140 bytes +14‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails?
• curprev 21:5921:59, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 11,126 bytes +7‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails?
• curprev 21:5921:59, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 11,119 bytes +1,452‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails?
• curprev 21:5021:50, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,667 bytes +7‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails?
• curprev 21:5021:50, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,660 bytes +7‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails?
• curprev 21:4921:49, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,653 bytes +627‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails?
• curprev 21:3421:34, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,026 bytes +1‎ →‎Legal Analysis(Re: Fact Situation)
• curprev 21:3121:31, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,025 bytes +2‎ →‎Re: If the spousal status has been removed, does the former spouse lose the protection of the RTA?
• curprev 21:3021:30, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,023 bytes −1,601‎ →‎Re: If the spousal status has been removed, does the former spouse lose the protection of the RTA?
• curprev 20:0520:05, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 10,624 bytes +301‎ →‎Re: If there is a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse, which definition prevails?
• curprev 20:0520:05, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 10,323 bytes −1‎ →‎Re: Is the boyfriend a spouse as defined by the RTA?
• curprev 20:0320:03, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 10,324 bytes +328‎ →‎Re: Is there a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse?
• curprev 20:0120:01, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,996 bytes +60‎ →‎Rights Can't be Removed once Conferred
• curprev 20:0020:00, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,936 bytes +129‎ →‎Re: Is there a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse?
• curprev 19:5819:58, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,807 bytes +104‎ →‎Re: Is there a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse?
• curprev 19:5719:57, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,703 bytes −3‎ →‎Fact Situation
• curprev 19:5719:57, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,706 bytes +47‎ →‎Fact Situation
• curprev 19:5619:56, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,659 bytes +207‎ →‎Re: Is there a conflict between the RTA and the code with respect to the meaning of spouse?
• curprev 19:5519:55, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,452 bytes +364‎ →‎Re: Is the boyfriend a spouse as defined by the Ontario Human Rights Code ("the code")?
• curprev 19:5219:52, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,088 bytes +286‎ →‎Re: Is the boyfriend a spouse as defined by the RTA?
• curprev 19:4619:46, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 8,802 bytes −486‎ →‎Spouse under the RTA
• curprev 19:4519:45, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,288 bytes −3‎ →‎Legal Analysis(Re: Fact Situation)
• curprev 19:4519:45, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,291 bytes +247‎ →‎Re: Is the boyfriend a spouse as defined by the RTA?
• curprev 19:4219:42, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 9,044 bytes +409‎ →‎Re: Is the boyfriend a spouse as defined by the RTA?
• curprev 19:3719:37, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 8,635 bytes −2,589‎ →‎Statutory Interpretation
• curprev 19:3619:36, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 11,224 bytes +7‎ →‎Re: Is the boyfriend a spouse as defined by the RTA?
• curprev 19:3519:35, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 11,217 bytes +205‎ →‎Legal Analysis(Re: Fact Situation)
• curprev 19:3419:34, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 11,012 bytes +324‎ →‎Re: Is the boyfriend a spouse as defined by the RTA?
• curprev 19:3219:32, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 10,688 bytes −539‎ →‎Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19{{HRC}}
• curprev 19:3119:31, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 11,227 bytes −14‎ →‎Re: Is the boyfriend a spouse as defined by the RTA?
• curprev 19:3119:31, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 11,241 bytes +544‎ →‎Re: Is the boyfriend a spouse as defined by the RTA?
• curprev 19:2919:29, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 10,697 bytes −1,198‎ →‎Spouse under the RTA
• curprev 19:2919:29, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 11,895 bytes −150‎ →‎Legal Analysis(Re: Fact Situation)
• curprev 19:2819:28, 2 May 2021‎ P08916 talk contribs‎ m 12,045 bytes +4‎ →‎Legal Theory (Re: Fact Situation)